 |
donderdag 11 januari 2007 |
|
CarrotWax
For the last few months, there's been considerable amount of hype about the movie "The Secret".
The first of them, obvious to anyone who's seen the movie, is the subtle (and not-so subtle) assumption that being rich is better. As a lot of new age workshops evolved from marketing, this is fairly common. "If you truly get it you can be as rich as you want!" is voiced. It's a subtle push of spiritual greed. At the core of things, there is no "better" – there is only "does it help for doing ____". It's certainly more comfortable not having to work overtime to survive or being able to buy organic foods, but 5 million dollar homes aren't better than a comfortable 1 bedroom apartment. In fact, from the soul's viewpoint, it's all about the lessons; sometimes money issues distract from the true learning going on. Secondly this movie has a LOT of hype – even in the movie itself, the first 10 minutes is just that. Hype in itself is quite interesting. When there's hype there's always a message of lack. "You need to know this! Your life will be better off with this knowledge!" – a message spoken with passion and zeal. However, if you look deeply into this, there is always the flip side: "your life is not perfect just as it is." All hype contains this – the perception of emptiness and lack that must be cultivated before a desire is born. Advertising knows this process intimately. So anytime you hear hype and sales, look inward and see what part of you buys into it; it's the same part that doubts its own perfection. The way things are spoken communicates far more than the words themselves, too. The maxim of "be the change you wish to see in the world" speaks to this – the embodiment of a message teaches more than words do. For those of you who have seen the movie (parts of it are available, as shown below), see if you can see the difference in the subtext between, say, Neale Donald Walsh or Esther Hicks and another subtext given by Rev Dr. Michael Beckwith, a fairly new age pastor. With Esther Hicks speaking, there's no "push", no need to convince anyone. Esther seems to breathe compassion, not because anything is wrong, but because it's the unfolding of her natural being and who she is creating as "her". As far as I can see, she's speaking to give others more tools for joy, but totally seeing their perfection as they are. With Neale Donald Walsh, there seems to be a bit of humor thrown in. "This is all a game, and we create our experiences, collectively and individually, and everything is truly perfect – let's play consciously!" is a message I got. There's a great acceptance and presence.
With the Rev Dr. Michael Beckwith, I felt his positive intentions glowing – he was obviously in touch with his sense of higher good. At the same time, there was a "push" and hype involved, leading me to feel a "I absolutely know what's best for you!" energy. It's a desire to help without a positive humility and perspective.. While this may feel good to those who want another to take away difficult choices, to me it doesn't truly help at all, because of the subtext involved.. "I know what's best for you" in a passionate voice that hasn't investigated each person individually is the same as "you don't know what's best for you." Back to myself, it's been part of my lifelong learning to see that everything in life is just perfect as it is. This includes George Bush, poverty, inequitable distribution of wealth, and all the problems we perceive out there. It also includes, of course, the soul's natural desire to help others out of love – it's not meant as an excuse for complaisance. Lately I've actually been feeling intensely grateful for my problems and limitations. The tension in my body, coming out regularly, is a great sign of lack of trust in the universe – and having it made physical makes the learning of that concrete and deep. Perhaps it'll only take a few more lifetimes to learn – who knows! (Patience is another thing I'm trying to learn, too!)
Posted: 11:59:33 PM
|
